:: Przegląd tematu - Teacher-student interaction barrier Causes _2811

e054831577

Teacher-student interaction barrier Causes

Not unified, there is a lack of transparency multiple standards, the lack of rationality; evaluation of the implementation process, lack of strict regulatory, procedural, evaluation results may be distorted, there can not be better to show a fair and just. Teacher-student interactions as there is an objective evaluation of teachers to students. If the evaluation itself is a problem. May change for students and between students, between students and teachers of partnership or relationship, doubts. Certainly among students,ugg italia, teachers and students in the formation of contacts between the barrier. Lan, to the communication strategy for the development of education exchanges between teachers and students is a complex process of interaction. While it is difficult to completely avoid the occurrence of the phenomenon of communication barrier. However, the strategy can be reduced by the phenomenon of communication barrier. In order to more effectively expand and deepen exchanges between teachers and students must correctly handle the education and communication, process and objectives, authority and freedom, education and life, the dignity of the teaching profession and the dignity of a wide range of relationship education. First. Education is both a means of communication. Is the purpose of education. Education itself is a major exchanges. People in education means that people in the contacts. If there is no in-depth and extensive exchanges. Is not true education. Education must be fully realized through the interaction. Exchanges have expanded and deepened through education. The function of education is to continuously improve the ability of people to contact. Continue to improve with others, with the world's exchanges. Build people, people and communication between the second world harmony. Correctly handle the process with the goal of \Improve the teacher-student interaction goals of freedom and flexibility. Target has a unitary and relatively static. Process is movement, change, process. Complexity, variability. Process and objectives \\If the change should be the same. Should be simple to complex. Process of change may be bound, the default target to guide the interaction. But can not and should control the exchanges. Extrinsic goals that developed in full accordance with the procedures of the exchanges. Is not conducive to the deepening of exchanges between the effective start and process. Third, correctly handle the relations between the authority and freedom. Recognition of the authority, but not just a certain authority in the authority of contacts is necessary. Teachers, textbooks, education, management, and authority. Teacher-student interaction is an important condition for realization. Jaspers said: \④ Li Yu in female students the appropriate authority of the spiritual pillar. But the authority should not be grounds for intercourse bondage. Teachers and students can not be denied the right to free thought exchanges excuse. When the authority of the contacts above the actual procedure. Students will be thinking of blocking the opening. Educators themselves will also thinking of blocking the opening. Fourth, properly handle the relationship between education and life. From the ultimate sense and education designed to make life better. Teacher-student interaction in the course of efforts to achieve the real-life education to the students the impact and penetration. The wisdom to enhance their lives, spiritual, lively angry. So that as the education of students and people living together and unified through communication through education to enable students to truly live. Fifth. Correctly handle the educational dignity and the dignity of teachers,belstaff italia, I think the relationship with the Department of Investigation. Transcendent dignity of education lies in the moment of interest in education to cultivate \Teacher education is the ideal of dignity, education, firmly defend the dignity and maintenance. Dignity of teachers is not dependent on external authority, power. But in its true character, wisdom and vision,tiffany schmuck, spirit and attitude as the internal basis. In the Learning society. Teachers should also have an open life situation, should remain a self-itself \Equally accessible to students to maintain a learning attitude. To restore itself in the open nature of life is not complete the course. Dealings with students students accepted in good faith. Teaching and learning. In the knowledge era. Teachers can not become the spokesman for all the knowledge and the owner. In a knowledge-centered education grant. The dominant position of teachers is clear: but in the learning-centered education, more students means that teachers participate in learning activities: past,true religion, collaborators, mentors, proponents. Rather than simply control who dominate ① Liu Tiefang comment. Educational philosophy to life [M]. Changsha: Hunan Normal University Press ,ugg botas,2005:124-125. ② Marvin pass. Commun1cation the translation and meaning of [J]. Reading, 1995 (10). ⑨ education foundation [M]. Beijing: Science Education Press, 2002:126. ④ Jaspers. What is Education [H]. Beijing: Joint Publishing, 1991:81. A FUJIAN'FRIBUNIE, - ■ ■