lines. In a famous letter from the be-
ginning of his so-called critical period to his friend and colleague Marcus Herz
Kant describes his concern to understand the relation of the representation
(Vorstellung) to the object.
7 In the
Critique of Pure Reason he claims that expe-
rience and knowledge of objects are possible if and only if the object we know
is in some sense “produced” by the subject as a condition of knowledge on
the grounds that “reason has insight only into what it itself produces ac-
cording to its own plan.”
8
Kant’s ahistorical perspective changes sharply after the French Revolu-
185Marx the Hegelian
tion in the writings of the post-Kantian idealistswho are all historical think-
ersincluding FichteSchellingand above all Hegel. In what sense is Hegel’s
position Copernican? The answer lies in the way in which it continues and
builds on Kant’s basic “constructivist” claim that knowledge is possible if
and only if we “produce” what we know. Kantwho contends that the sub-
ject must produce the object it knowsis unable to explain how that occurs.
He concedes his inability to describe this activitywhich he refers to in a pas-
sage on the sch [link widoczny dla zalogowanych][link widoczny dla zalogowanych]tism – the faculty througyilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Możesz pisać nowe tematy Możesz odpowiadać w tematach Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów Nie możesz głosować w ankietach