The cost of strengthening the engineering staff aw -

e054831577

Engineering staff to enhance awareness of the cost

Incentives and disincentives. ① the construction of the legal person in the design contract signed with the design unit, should limit the design requirements and the corresponding incentives and disincentives to write the commission contract. Those who can not meet the requirements, the design fee should be appropriately reduced, and vice versa, to limit the design is done well, saving the cost of investment and control that had proved effective, the project design unit should be appropriate legal incentives. ② preliminary design estimates (estimated by the phase of the same price level in years) of static investment should not exceed 110% of the estimated approval, or preliminary design should be re-done, press the \of the Institute for punishment,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], including the approval of a design unit qualification, to finalize the estimate (without deduction part) 104% as the base, lower or more than 1% each, the stage design awards or fee reduction of 1%. ③ the construction design stage (at the same price level and the budget for the year) of static investment should not exceed the approval of the budget. Validation estimates by the static price (net of non-decomposed part) of 102% as the base, lower or more than 1% each, reward or reduced fee of 1% of the stage design. ④ commitment to limit the design unit, to develop within the limits of the unit design assessment and incentives and disincentives. Attention to the design limit and control access to save investment cost effective offices and the outstanding achievements of individuals, should be rewarded; limits do not attach importance to the design,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], do not take measures to save and invest, resulting in more than investment in a professional design offices and personal to the limits and economic penalties. Designed to improve the 5 limit less than 5.1 limits the design limits in the active implementation of the design should also be aware of its weaknesses in order to be developed in the implementation process, refined and improved. Mainly in the following areas: (1) fir the value of the project, an appropriate increase in cost, increased functionality and cost the same, functions improving the value of these two ways of improving the design of the ceiling can not be fully utilized, especially the former, in the limit design can not be fully utilized; (2) limit the design may be completed, but the cost of the project life cycle to consider less, there will be life cycle cost is not necessarily economic phenomenon; (3) may occur when the design is complete, only to find ultra-investment estimates or budget for making changes, if the limit to meet the design requirements, to the changes you make in a passive investment control; such as requirements to meet the investment limits, no change, there will reduce the design is reasonable. To consider the investment limits and often the main, this is the essential characteristic of the design limits of the decision. Designed to improve the limit of 5.2 (1) correctly understand the meaning of limit design. Although the nature of the design features limit the investment control of the initiative, but on the other hand limits the design also includes the construction project life-cycle costs. (2) reasonably determine and correct understanding of the design limit. To reasonably determine the design limits of the design phase in the use of value engineering principles to design, especially in the limit of the design target (ceiling amount) to determine the feasibility study before the program design, value engineering activities to strengthen analysis, careful selection of the project cost best match with the functional design, including an appropriate increase in cost, increased functionality and cost the same, features to improve both. This is the previously mentioned limits should be designed to carry out a feasibility study to deepen the depth of the first to improve the investment is reasonable and accurate estimation of the reason lies. If indeed in the investment limit is established, only to find better design,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], including appropriate to increase investment, improve the availability of functional design, the careful, comprehensive, scientific and reliable solution studies, technical and economic evaluation, and report to the competent authority After the adjustment or re-determine the allowed limit. This is the \(3) a reasonable statement and the use of sub-investment limits. The current design of the threshold limit (limit design goals) most of the estimated investment cost of the feasibility study for the ceiling, according to 90% of direct project costs ordered decomposition, leaving 10% as a regulator to use. In order to overcome these limits inadequate, according to the specific circumstances of the project using appropriate increase in the proportion of regulation,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], such as 15% ~ 20% left to do mediation used by 80% to 85% of the issued decomposition. This is the design process with creative, effective design does stand out and create favorable conditions for good design change provided for convenience. For the rational use of design limits,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the limit should be implemented dynamic management of design, professional design from the investment allocation limits and then isolated in a \The practical design using discounted amount is calculated as the actual design design investment allocation limits = limits (1 + I) ~ where: I announced the project cost to increase the relevant departments index (%); curse for the project design life (years .) Received Date: 2oo3-04-08

				fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Avalanche style by What Is Real © 2004