New American History Study results - Comment on -

nrzxfquxq

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
New American History Study results - Comment on \

History, \translation of the preamble, \④ Li Yong: \⑤ Zhang Guangzhi: \⑥ Zhang Guangzhi: \⑦ The authors note that Lu Shaoji's \\. See Li Yong: \l09 Historiography 1, 2005, \Chinese History solid academic accomplishment both the academic attainments and a lot of money, but also expand our historical perspective,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], study of the history of our country (especially the Western History Research) opened up a new area of research, contribute to our historical theory further development of the research work. Third, reflecting the spirit of enterprising academic and scientific rigor of academic integrity in the New History of a comprehensive system of inspection process, for the first time noted that some scholars have ignored or taken lightly, and put forward their own insights, showing a spirit of academic courage to forge ahead. For example, the authors point out that Robinson's history, there are many paradoxes in thought, he only stressed the breadth of history, again limiting their field of study History of range; not only against the history of the reference function,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but also the history of ideas conducted under the national industrial education; neither admitted history can be summed up law, but also believe in evolution; only that history is not science, but also advocated the study of history a scientific attitude to history into a science. In addition, he also pointed out in his book the domestic academic community and the school principal members of the Robinson History purport differences and their history before and after the changes advocated by insufficient attention. Vast and complex history as a genre, Robinson has agreed a new side of history, but there are also inherent differences. These aspects of the investigation and in order, to deepen our overall understanding of this school to make it more full, lively presented before us. In addition, the authors of relevant material in the possession and use, do not blindly follow others, 110, senior's point of view, conception of innovation, against the original retranslation of the book quoted some of the foreign materials,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and that related to older translations of some historians Mistakes. This reflects the scientific rigor of academic integrity. For example, in the text of a note, the authors pointed out the Robinson \Part of the book referred to in the name of foreign scholars, authors tend to note the different times given in the form of the Chinese translation, and then gives his own translation (such as the author of \of Robinson,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Beard, Becker and others of the different translation, and then determine their own translation.) Of course, \In addition, a number of English names and titles of the translation still be open to question, such as the Higham translated as \afeber translated as \to \These deficiencies and the \Author: Xu Liang (1972 a), male, people in Fuyang, Anhui, Ph.D. Department of History, Fudan University. Editor: Wang Qian Yong dry ①: (-t-Robinson, New History School \

				fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Avalanche style by What Is Real © 2004