mbt sapatu white|201005112112092869aml -

sam65166

'' for both the accused.
% VIII
Another verdict may now seem to have been hardly possible. The
accusation was built up on the jealousy of neighbourson chance
circumstanceson testimonies founded on petty spite. Butcombined
with the medico-legal evidencethe weight of circumstance might easily
have hoisted the accused in the balance.
It will be seenthenhow much on foot the case of the Veuve Lacoste
was with that of the Veuve Boursiertwenty years before.
It is on the experience of cases such as these two that the technique of
investigation into arsenical poison has been evolved. In the case of
Veuve Boursier you find M. Orfila discovering oxide of arsenic where M.
Barruel saw only grains of fat. Four years previous to the case of the
Veuve Lacoste that same Orfila came into the trial of Mme Lafarge with
the first use in medical jurisprudence of the Marsh testand based on the
experiment a cocksure opinion which had much to do with the
condemnation of that unfortunate woman. In the Lacoste trial you find
the Parisian experts giving an opinion of no greater value than that of
Orfila's in the Lafarge casebut find also an element of doubt introduced
by the country practitionerwith his common sense on the then moot
question of the [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]yilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

doc martens|201005112112042858bfq

				fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Avalanche style by What Is Real © 2004