Gigantic Feeds, The Case Study_1306 -

ghdhair100

Gigantic Feeds, The Case Study
Gigantic Feeds,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], The Case StudyShare this Blog Entry: EzineArticles expert author Raj Kumar Dash recently wrote an article on 8220;Gigantic Feeds 8211; EzineArticles Case Study8221; where he mused about how we added over 19k (now over 20k) new RSS feeds.I should clarify 3-4 things:1) We like helping both writers and publishers,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but we are heavily slanted towards the needs of our writers. Publishers who are not writers are often unkind to us. 8230;so, we enjoy helping writers and publishers who are writers. Publishers who are not writers that follow our reprint rights TOS & Rules are also valued stakeholders. 2) All together, we have about 23,000+ RSS feeds right now: (1) for every single author, (1) for every single category and some other miscellaneous feeds for various article views or stats.In addition,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], for select private partners, we have a keyword searchable RSS feed that gives direct access to our database search results in real-time.3) We do not use any 3rd party services to produce or track our RSS feeds. Everything was developed in-house. Yes, we cracked open the XML books and our programming team became XML self-taught.FULL vs. PARTIAL FEEDS issue:As far as to the ludicrous debate taking place again in the blogosphere about whether RSS feeds should be Full-Feed or Partial-Feed: We have zero plans to ever offer full feeds. Those who advocate full-feeds are not seeing the big picture. Selfishly, some want to speed up their personal use of full RSS feeds so that they don8217;t have to visit your website to get access to the content. This is in direct conflict with one of the points of our site (to deliver traffic and exposure to our authors website in exchange for their article submissions) and we minimize RSS abuse by not publishing full feeds.Your thoughts or questions?
The Court of Appeal pointed out that R and F's submission in the county court was of overt, conscious racism, and it was not prepared to find that there had been unconscious discrimination.The decisionThe Court of Appeal said that, unlike the ordinary civil claim where the judge decides, on the claimant's evidence only, whether the claimant has made out a case, in this case the judge had had the benefit of the whole of the evidence. Despite the school's failure to comply with the statutory requirements, the judge had been entitled to find on the basis of all the evidence that R and F had not proved racial discrimination.

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

				fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Avalanche style by What Is Real © 2004