On Gandhi and the Partition of India _970 -

px804726

On Gandhi and the Partition of India

The plan, as long as it does not cause disturbances or violence. Second, Gandhi suggested to the Indian people decide their own futures. Therefore, he provided for the Governor to the provinces to choose their own idea of the road; third, Gandhi urged the British to leave India and the transfer of power. 0 The reason why Gandhi after the announcement of the Mountbatten plan was extremely uncomfortable, and probably also from the heart and he had to say about the Governor's consent. June 14, Gandhi, the All India Congress Party meeting in his speech, expressed support for the Congress Working Committee accepted the 6.3 plan. Thus, the facts come to the inevitable conclusion: Gandhi in dire need of his time using his moral authority is not using it. Not as people expected to use his power of possession and his reputation among the masses against the division, a division of the partnership intentionally. 0 All in all, although the partition of India and Pakistan may be the root cause of Hindus and Muslims in the political, religious and cultural aspects of the great differences, the two races took place in the history of rivalry and get in the way the British colonial rulers led to large-scale ethnic killings, but not without any chance to change that. If you can Lucknow agreement, or the Cabinet Mission plan implemented, the Indian division of the situation may be avoided. Unfortunately, to Gandhi-led Congress not only failed to grasp these opportunities, but also because of some improper measures to accelerate the arrival of the division. ① Renming Gao,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], of Gandhi, Shanghai Social Science Press, 198,712 monthly edition. ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑦ ⑧ ⑨ ⑩ Wolpert, Sianley, JirmanofPakistan, Delhi, 1985, pp27-27, pp34-35, p42, pp40-41, p46, pp48-49, p82, p38, p54, p55, r67, p45, pp45-46, p69, pp71- 74, p75, p77. ⑥ Zhu Tingguang, foreign history, celebrity biography, the modern part of the next book, China Social Sciences Publishing House, 1984 edition, p. 473. ⑦ Mathur, Y. B. , GrowthofMuslimPoliticsInIndia, Delhi, 1979, p176. ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ⑦ ④ 0Sa/ldha ~ r, Gandhi, GandhksmandthePartitionofIndia, Dilhi, 1982. p21. p2 = 2. p2 = 2. p23. p24. m36-37.0 Rahim, Pakistan Brief History, Volume IV, Sichuan People's Publishing House, 1976, p. 346. ④ S. R. Sharma, Analo 【ofCommunalism, Vd. 4, MohammadAliJinv. mandCxxnamunalI. eauiership, NewDelhi, 1998. pp226-227. @ Tun Philips, C. H. , TheEvolutionofIndiaandPakistan, 1858to1947: SdectDocuments, London, 1962. m356-257. p356. ① Marlse basis, N. , TransferofPower ,1942-7, Ⅷ. VII. London, 1977. ms82-591. ⑦ 0 ⑦ ⑦ 0 @ AzadIndialsFreedom: AnAutobiographicalNarrative, Calertta, 1959. p150. pp184-185. p186. p187. pp187-188. p188. ④ 0Nehru, SdetedWorksofJawaharlalNihm, NewDelhi, 1982. wa42-231. ④ 0Read, A & Fisher, D, TheProudestDay: India'8LongRoadtoIndependence, London, 1997. PP. 390-392, p393. ④, N. , TheTransterofPower ,1942-7, V0l Ⅺ, I. g) ig] on, 1982. p48. Hodson, H. V. , TheGreatDivide: Britain-India-Parisian, Karaehi, 1985, m317-318. * 93

				fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group Avalanche style by What Is Real © 2004